front page
daily news
news archive
ask the editor
articles
reviews
tutorials


free scripts
meta tags
hosting
search engines


about us
welcome
mission
press room
contact
privacy

All Content in
Webmaster Techniques
Magazine is
©Copyright 2005.
All Rights Reserved



Thanksgiving Day , November 23, 2000

Firms Must Embrace "Microdesign" To Overhaul Today's Woeful WAP Experience

Today's WAP sites fall short by failing to recognize mobile users' unique needs. However, before overhauling their mobile Internet sites, firms must master the new competency of "Microdesign," built on effortless navigation and concise content. This is the central argument of a new Report by Forrester Research B.V.

To understand how today's WAP sites serve today's mobile Internet users, Forrester conducted in-depth user experience reviews of 50 WAP sites during the first three weeks of October this year. Of the 50 sites tested, none scored a passing grade, and the average site failed on more than half of our criteria.

"Today's WAP sites fail for one central reason: firms are force-fitting existing Web content onto a tiny screen without considering the unique needs of mobile users," commented Carsten Schmidt, associate analyst at Forrester. "Because of the mobile Net's unique attributes, Web experience doesn't yield WAP success, and the lessons learned from years of Web site design fail to apply to mobile devices. Instead, companies must unlearn the Web's rules and master a new competency that Forrester calls Microdesign."

Microdesign rests on three principles -- obvious navigation, concise content, and automated integration with other channels. Users must be able to tap a site's value immediately without learning a navigation scheme. Content must be optimized for small screens and only users who demand more depth should see it. And mobile offerings must synchronize with other channels, like the Web and iDTV, invisibly and immediately. Forrester believes that by failing to address Microdesign, firms risk brand erosion, decreased traffic in other channels, lost revenues, and ultimately, lost customers.

"Microdesign requires more than a new set of best practices," Schmidt added. "Mobile customers demand a shift away from site designers and success metrics, toward an approach that opposes the PC-based Web. To accommodate small mobile displays -- four to five short lines plus one header -- navigation and content must be continuously interwoven, and access to that content must be immediate, fluid, and precise."

As PC and iDTV use grows, mobile Internet sites must work with other channels. WAP sites must be built on the same business rules and data as other electronic channels. Firms must offer Web and iDTV sites that personalize their mobile Internet experiences, providing users with names and passwords, and apply preferences from other channels to mobile visitors on their first visit.

"The Web challenged companies to offer richness and interactivity compared with print material, and mobile devices challenge firms to create smaller and simpler content available at anytime," Schmidt concluded. "Mobile sites must help users get something done quickly in as few pages as possible. To serve time-starved users effectively, WAP sites must become available at any relevant moment with content edited to a minimum length. So while the mobile Internet won't capture big direct revenues -- only €5 billion in retail sales in 2005 -- it will influence up to 40 times as much indirectly, which makes the application of Microdesign imperative."

Survey Methodology
The WAP sites surveyed were balanced across 11 countries and 10 categories. Forrester relied on the Nokia 7110 phone for basic testing but also used the Ericsson R380 and the Siemens S35 to test browser compatibility. For each site category, Forrester identified three key tasks -- such as checking a stock price for financial sites or posting a bid for auctions. As we tried to complete these tasks at each site, we graded 16 criteria on a four-point scale: 2 (exemplary pass), 1 (pass), -1 (failure), or -2 (critical failure).


News and Election Sites Were Stressed
Many of the Web sites reporting on elections results performed poorly for voters seeking information online on Election Day, Tuesday, November 7, according to Keynote Systems. The public seeking voting information and results online found it difficult to access many of the Web sites of the Presidential candidates, political parties and news organizations, although the Internet as a whole continued to function normally.

Performance of the news sites started to slow early in the day, peaking at mid-afternoon between 3:00 to 6:00pm PST. MSNBC averaged 24.27 seconds and USA Today averaged 20.43 seconds between 8:00am and 12:00pm PST. Between 3:00 and 6:00pm PST MSNBC peaked at 32.54 seconds and 58.9 percent availability; CNN averaged 15.24 seconds; and USA Today improved to 2.25 seconds. Early in the evening, from 6:00 to 9:00pm PST, many news sites still averaged over 10 seconds, with MSNBC at 17.74 seconds and 57.1percent availability. After 9:00pm PST, all of the news sites performed under 10 seconds, except MSNBC, averaging 11.61 seconds with 72.5 percent availability.

The sites of the Democratic National Committee and Ralph Nader experienced significant performance degradation during the day. Between 12:00pm to 3:00pm PST, Democrats.org averaged 84.74 seconds to download, at 93.1 percent availability; votenader.com averaged 53.29 seconds, with 65.5 percent availability. The Republican National Committee Web site was largely unavailable between 8:45 to 9:45am PST due to a hack attack on the site, which reduced the site's availability to less than one percent. Between 9:00pm and midnight PST, the George W. Bush site had trouble responding, with average performance of 17.45 seconds and availability of 9.4 percent.

During the day on Wednesday, November 8, The New York Times, MSNBC, and USA Today Web sites continued to experience slower than normal response times, as did the George W. Bush and Ralph Nader sites; other sites returned to near normal levels. Between 5:00 to 8:00am PST, the New York Times site averaged 110.17 seconds and 64.2 percent availability.

Performance of the site for the Florida Division of Elections averaged 35.32 seconds with 22.8 percent availability from noon until midnight on Thursday, November 9. The Drudge Report site averaged 30.17 seconds and availability was 36.8 percent during the same time period.

"These elections have shown the public's widespread reliance on the Web to provide up to date news and information. It has also exposed the sites' level of readiness for this extreme traffic flow," said Daniel Todd, Director of Public Services, Keynote Systems. "The 2000 elections have served to underscore the preparation Web sites need to undertake to meet traffic storms."

Keynote Systems measured the performance and availability of the elections Web sites every 15 minutes from 5:00am to midnight on Tuesday and Wednesday, November 7 and 8 via T1/T3 connections from 66 Internet access points in 25 metropolitan areas in the United States, a subset of Keynote's global network of measurement computers in over 120 locations around the world. Results are based on over 5000 measurements for each site during the time period reported.


Return to November 2000 News Archive